Paving Contractor Insurance by State
Texas Paving Contractor Insurance
Texas licenses no paving contractor and leaves workers’ compensation to the employer on private work — but home-rule cities, TxDOT lettings and every governmental construction contract set terms of their own.
Insuring a Texas paving, sealcoating or striping business starts with the familiar lines — general liability, contractors equipment, commercial auto and property — plus a workers’ compensation decision the state leaves, on private work, to the employer. Texas sets no state license for this trade and no state rule on coal-tar sealer, so the terms that shape a program come from other directions: the city a lot sits in, TxDOT when you bid its roads, and any governmental owner, whose construction contracts require workers’ compensation whether or not you would carry it otherwise.
The working line in Texas runs between private and public jobs. A firm on shopping centers, apartment drives and home driveways needs no state credential; a firm that also bids public roadwork meets a qualification file, a bond, contract insurance terms and a signed coverage certification before its paver moves.
Texas has no paving license — home-rule cities and public owners still set terms
There is no Texas state license for general contractors, and asphalt paving, sealcoating and pavement striping need no state trade license of their own. The Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation runs a fixed roster of regulated programs, among them electricians, air conditioning and refrigeration contractors and water well drillers, and asphalt work is not on it; no chapter of the Occupations Code licenses it either.
Two sets of rules still reach the work. A Texas home-rule city holds full power of local self-government, bounded by the rule that its ordinances must be consistent with state law, so the city where a lot or driveway is paved can still require its own registration or permit; and any building or construction contract with a Texas governmental entity, roadway work included, obliges the contractor to certify in writing that it covers its employees on that project with workers’ compensation insurance.
Authority Texas Occupations Code (all chapters swept); Tex. Loc. Gov’t Code §§ 51.002, 51.071, 51.072(a); Tex. Lab. Code § 406.096 · read the source · checked
The licenses Texas does issue are single trades, each defined by its own subject matter, and asphalt is not among them in any chapter of the Occupations Code. Where a paving firm meets a registration or permit requirement, the source is local, and the Local Government Code explains how a city can impose one. The grant of power reaches a particular kind of city only:
“This subchapter applies only to a home-rule municipality.”
“(a) The municipality has full power of local self-government.”
Broad, but bounded. The same code holds an ordinance to the state’s own law:
“the governing body of a municipality may adopt, enforce, or maintain an ordinance or rule only if the ordinance or rule is consistent with the laws of this state.”
No particular Texas city’s paving ordinance was verified for this page, so none is named, and the public-contract rule in the finding above is quoted in the workers’ compensation section. Before the first job inside a new city limit, call the permits office, ask what it requires of a paving or sealcoating contractor, and ask whether it wants a certificate of insurance on file. That certificate is often the same one a property manager requests, which is why the general liability program needs additional insured and primary wording that can be issued the day it is asked for.
Coal-tar sealer: nothing at state level, one city rule worth knowing
Coal-tar pavement sealant is not banned, limited or label-regulated anywhere in Texas state law: no statute in any of the state’s codes addresses it, and a search of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality’s own site turns up no rule on it.
The state’s silence stops at some city lines. Austin’s City Code forbids using a high-PAH pavement product anywhere in the city’s planning jurisdiction, so a sealcoating crew should read the local code where the lot sits, and the owner’s specification, before it picks a product.
Authority Texas statutes (all codes) swept; Austin City Code §§ 6-6-1, 6-6-2 (a city example only) · read the source · checked
That answer rests on a full read of the Texas statutes and a search of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality site. The Texas Administrative Code could not be read end to end, so this page does not claim that no rule sits anywhere in it.
Austin shows why the state answer is not the whole answer. Its code reaches the use of a product, not only its sale:
“(A) Except as provided in Section 6-6-4 (Exemptions), a person may not use a high PAH … pavement product within the City's planning jurisdiction.”
and the pavement products it has in mind are defined by the surfaces they are made for:
“is for use on an asphalt or concrete surface, including a driveway, playground, or parking area.”
The code separately restricts selling such a product inside the same jurisdiction, and lets the city’s director grant exemptions for research or where no viable alternative exists. What counts as high-PAH is set by a definition in the city code, read against the product’s own documentation; this page makes no claim about which sealers fall on either side. Austin is one verified example, not a pattern: no other Texas city’s rule was checked.
For a sealcoating operation, the exposures on the lot do not change with the product in the tank: mist drifting onto parked vehicles, sealer carried on shoes into a lobby, runoff toward a storm inlet before the coat cures. Whether a release that reaches water is answered by the liability policy or needs pollution coverage is settled by policy wording, not by the absence of a state rule.
TxDOT lettings: qualify to bid, then insure and bond the contract
Before a firm can bid on, or even be issued a proposal for, a Texas Department of Transportation construction or maintenance project, TxDOT must qualify it, and the Construction Division reviews the firm’s financial statements, equipment and experience to do so. Projects TxDOT marks as waived, usually smaller, routine maintenance, emergency or specialty work, accept a shorter bidder’s questionnaire, and subcontractors are not prequalified at all. Qualification adds no insurance requirement; insurance and the contractor’s bond attach once a contract is won.
Authority Tex. Admin. Code tit. 43, § 9.12 (rule; read via locator, not quoted); Tex. Transp. Code § 223.006 · read the source · checked
The requirement is the department’s own, set by the transportation commission’s rule rather than by any section of the Transportation Code, and the Texas Department of Transportation states it without hedging:
“TxDOT must qualify bidders to become eligible to bid or to receive a bid proposal on a construction or maintenance project.”
For a firm that bids smaller jobs, the lighter level is the one to know. The full review — a confidential questionnaire backed by audited financial statements — gives way on projects the department designates as waived:
“This level of qualification is for bidding on projects for which the full requirements outlined above are waived—normally smaller construction, routine maintenance, emergency, and specialty projects.”
A firm working under a prime sits outside qualification altogether, though not outside every requirement:
“Subcontractors do NOT need to be prequalified with TxDOT. Subcontractors DO need to be registered with the Texas Secretary of State”
The department’s page goes on to name federal E-Verify registration as well. Qualification looks backward at equipment a firm already has; the contractors equipment floater has to look forward, because a contract won at a letting can bring rented machines that need scheduling before they reach the job.
Insurance arrives with the contract, not the questionnaire
The qualification rule says nothing about insurance or bonds. The insurance duty belongs to the contract, and to the prime contractor for as long as it is on a department job:
“TxDOT requires every prime contractor, construction or maintenance, to maintain current insurance while working on TxDOT projects.”
The department’s insurance page sends prime contractors to its standard specifications for the detail, so limits and endorsements come from the specification and the contract. A subcontractor answers to the prime’s subcontract, which can carry those terms down the chain.
Bonds and proposal guaranties
“A successful bidder under this subchapter shall post a bond in an amount provided by law conditioned on the faithful compliance with the bidder's bid and performance of the contract and made payable to the department for the use and benefit of the state highway fund.”
Where the department’s rules call for a guaranty with a proposal, the statute lets a bidder choose among instruments — a surety’s bid bond, a check drawn by a bank or a money order, or some other means the department finds suitable. Apart from department lettings, the Government Code requires a performance bond on public work contracts above a contract size it sets and a payment bond above another, with a different payment-bond line for municipalities; those thresholds are left to the statute. Surety capacity is arranged ahead of a bid season, not after a letting is announced.
Subscriber or non-subscriber: the Texas workers’ compensation choice
Texas lets most private employers decide for themselves whether to carry workers’ compensation: an employer that buys a policy or is certified to self-insure is a subscriber, and one that does not is a non-subscriber. Declining has a price. When an injured employee of a non-subscriber sues, the employer cannot argue that the worker was contributorily negligent, assumed the risk, or was hurt by a co-worker’s negligence; it keeps only the defenses that the worker meant to cause the injury or was intoxicated, and the worker still has to prove the employer was negligent.
Electing out is not the end of the paperwork, and on public work it is not an option. A non-subscriber must tell its employees in writing and by posted notice that it has no coverage and must file notice with the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation; and a contractor on a building or construction contract with any Texas governmental entity, which by statute includes roadway work, must certify that it covers every employee on that project, with each subcontractor certifying the same.
Authority Tex. Lab. Code §§ 406.002, 406.003, 406.004, 406.005, 406.033, 406.096 · read the source · checked
The election is written into the Labor Code, and it belongs to employers other than public ones:
“(a) Except for public employers and as otherwise provided by law, an employer may elect to obtain workers' compensation insurance coverage. (b) An employer who elects to obtain coverage is subject to this subtitle.”
Where a policy is bought, no route is exclusive; the Texas Department of Insurance regulates the insurers as it does every other line. Payroll splits and working owners are covered on the workers’ compensation page.
What a non-subscriber gives up, and what it keeps
The price of declining appears only when an employee is hurt and sues. The statute removes the defenses an employer would otherwise lean on hardest:
“(a) In an action against an employer by or on behalf of an employee who is not covered by workers' compensation insurance obtained in the manner authorized by Section 406.003 to recover damages for personal injuries or death sustained by an employee in the course and scope of the employment, it is not a defense that: (1) the employee was guilty of contributory negligence; (2) the employee assumed the risk of injury or death; or (3) the injury or death was caused by the negligence of a fellow employee.”
It leaves the employer two, and it leaves the burden of proof with the injured worker:
“(c) The employer may defend the action on the ground that the injury was caused: (1) by an act of the employee intended to bring about the injury; or (2) while the employee was in a state of intoxication. (d) In an action described by Subsection (a), the plaintiff must prove negligence of the employer or of an agent or servant of the employer acting within the general scope of the agent's or servant's employment.”
That second half is easy to overlook. A non-subscriber is not liable for every injury on its crew; the worker still has to show that the employer, or someone acting for it within the scope of the job, was negligent. What is gone are the arguments an employer would reach for first. Protection against that suit is a different policy from statutory workers’ compensation, and placing one is an underwriting question. The subscriber side carries its own exception:
“Except in cases of gross negligence resulting in a fatality, workers' compensation insurance coverage limits your liability if an employee sues your business for damages.”
Public work removes the choice
On a governmental building or construction contract the election does not exist, and the statute follows the work down through every subcontract:
“(a) A governmental entity that enters into a building or construction contract shall require the contractor to certify in writing that the contractor provides workers' compensation insurance coverage for each employee of the contractor employed on the public project.”
“(b) Each subcontractor on the public project shall provide such a certificate relating to coverage of the subcontractor's employees to the general contractor, who shall provide the subcontractor's certificate to the governmental entity.”
“(1) "Building or construction" includes: (A) erecting or preparing to erect a structure, including a building, bridge, roadway, public utility facility, or related appurtenance;”
Roadway is named in that definition, so a non-subscriber needs coverage in place before it takes a public road subcontract. Whether a particular scope — a striping-only job, say — falls within the definition is for the contract documents and the governmental owner to settle.
The Texas agencies behind each rule on this page
Each rule above traces to one of these bodies, and none of them speaks for the others:
Texas paving markets and the TxDOT districts that plan their roads
The department runs state highways through districts named for cities, each listing the counties it covers. Each card gives a market’s seat county and that county’s district; several of these cities run across county lines.
Houston
Harris County. Houston District.
The city is its county’s seat and names the district. A firm here can hold a city permit, a private owner’s contract and a road subcontract at once, each wanting a differently worded certificate.
Dallas
Dallas County. Dallas District.
The city and its district share a name. A crew that crosses county lines between jobs should have every yard its trucks leave from listed on the auto and equipment schedules.
San Antonio
Bexar County. San Antonio District.
City, county and state road owners all let work here, and the certification rule treats each alike: a non-subscriber needs coverage bound before it signs.
Austin
Travis County. Austin District.
The one Texas city on this page whose sealant rule was verified: high-PAH pavement products are barred in its planning jurisdiction. Qualification questionnaires go to the Construction Division here.
Fort Worth
Tarrant County. Fort Worth District.
State road work here falls in a different district from Dallas work, so a firm with jobs in both answers to separate districts, each project with its own insurance article.
El Paso
El Paso County. El Paso District.
City, county and district share one name. For a firm based in another district, the schedules should show where machines are kept between jobs here.
What moves the price of a Texas paving program
What moves the price of a Texas paving program — the mix of paving, sealcoating and striping work, the payroll and loss history behind it, and how the state’s workers compensation system is bought — is set out in our Texas paving insurance cost guide. This page keeps to Texas’s rules, agencies and markets; the guide keeps to what an underwriter reads.
Where Texas paving claims come from
An injured employee at a non-subscriber. When a crew member is burned at the screed or struck by a backing machine, a firm without coverage faces a negligence suit from its own worker, argued without the defenses the statute removes.
Sealer or paint carried off the job. Wet sealer on a tire or a shoe ends up on a lobby floor or a customer’s car. Damage to someone else’s property is a third-party liability claim; redoing your own coat is a cost of the job, and the general liability policy wording draws the line.
Traffic control that fails on a public road. A lane closure set up short or a sign knocked down; when a motorist is hurt, the contract’s indemnity and additional insured terms decide who answers first.
Equipment stolen or damaged away from the yard. A roller left on a site over a weekend, a trailer parked at a lot between phases. The floater answers if the machine is scheduled and the site meets the policy’s conditions.
Texas: Contractor license, no statewide license reaches this work, connected to the General Liability page. Coal-tar sealant, no state rule on the product, connected to the Asphalt Sealcoating Insurance page. Transportation department prequalification, applies to department road work, connected to the Commercial Auto page. Workers’ compensation, not compulsory for every employer, connected to the Workers Compensation page. The diagram pairs each state rule with the page on this site that discusses it and shows no figures.
Nearby states we also write
Texas shares a border with each state listed below, and every one of them is licensed here too. Their pages are researched from their own statutes and agencies, and none of this page’s findings — the elective workers’ compensation system least of all — should be assumed to hold on the other side of the line.
Related coverage and services
What we insure
Coverage lines
Texas paving contractor insurance questions
Is there a Texas state license for asphalt paving or sealcoating?
No state license applies. Texas has no general contractor license at all, and the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation runs no program for paving, sealcoating or striping. A home-rule city can still set registration or permit terms of its own, provided they are consistent with state law, so ask the permit office before the first job in a new city. A governmental owner will also want written proof of workers’ compensation coverage.
Does Texas ban coal-tar sealer?
Not at the state level. The statutes contain no rule on it and a search of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality site found none; the administrative code could not be read in full, so that is the edge of the finding. Cities are another matter: Austin bars high-PAH pavement products inside its planning jurisdiction. Read the local code and the owner’s specification before choosing a product.
Do I need TxDOT prequalification to work as a subcontractor?
No. TxDOT qualifies the firms that bid on or receive proposals for its construction and maintenance projects, and it states plainly that subcontractors are exempt from that. A subcontractor does need to be registered with the Texas Secretary of State, and the department’s page also names federal E-Verify registration. The prime’s subcontract will still pass insurance terms down, and public work carries its own coverage certification.
Does qualifying with TxDOT mean I must carry certain insurance?
Qualification itself asks nothing about insurance or bonds. The requirement arrives with a contract: TxDOT requires prime contractors to keep insurance current while they work its projects, and its insurance page points to the standard specifications for the terms. A successful bidder also posts a bond payable to the department. Arrange both before the letting, because surety credit is written on your finances and takes time.
Is workers’ compensation optional for a Texas paving company?
Generally yes for private work: a private employer in Texas may elect coverage or become a non-subscriber. Declining brings its own duties, including written and posted notice to employees and a filing with the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation. On a building or construction contract with a governmental entity, roadway work included, the choice disappears, and the contractor and each subcontractor must certify coverage for the people on that project.
What happens if an employee of a non-subscriber is hurt and sues?
The employer loses the arguments that the worker was careless, accepted the danger, or was hurt through a co-worker’s negligence. Two defenses survive — an injury the worker set out to cause, and one suffered while intoxicated — and the burden of proving the employer’s negligence stays with the worker. Liability is not automatic, but the case is a lawsuit rather than a benefits claim, and the program has to be built with that in mind.
Can a subscriber still be sued by an injured employee?
Coverage narrows that exposure without erasing it in every case. The state’s workers’ compensation division says a policy limits an employer’s liability when an employee sues, with an exception for gross negligence that results in a death. That is why employer’s liability coverage stays in the program even for a subscriber, and why its limits should be read against what your contracts ask for.
This page describes insurance for paving and asphalt contractors operating in this state. It is general information, not legal advice and not a statement of coverage. Licensing, permitting and environmental requirements change; verify current requirements with the agency named before relying on them.
Get a quote for your Texas paving work
Tell us how your Texas work splits between private lots and public contracts, and whether you subscribe, and we will build the program around those answers.